Soft Mint vs Svalbard Sea
Soft Mint is a Behr color while Svalbard Sea comes from Jotun. Soft Mint reads as blue-green, while Svalbard Sea reads as blue — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. At LRV 77 vs 69, Soft Mint will read as the brighter of the two — a 7-point gap that matters most in north-facing or low-light rooms. The tonal difference — Soft Mint's green character against Svalbard Sea's cool — becomes most visible against white trim or in morning light. At ΔE 7.7, the difference is perceptible but not dramatic — the two can work harmoniously in the same space. Below you'll find 2 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Soft Mint vs Svalbard Sea in Real Spaces
2 real rooms side by side. Soft Mint and Svalbard Sea are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
Living rooms test a color across a full range of conditions — morning sun, afternoon shade, and evening lamp light all shift how both of these read. Soft Mint has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Bathroom
Bathrooms amplify color — the enclosed space and reflective surfaces make what reads subtle elsewhere feel more present here. The brightness difference is modest but present — Soft Mint gives the walls a little more lift.
Color Details
Soft Mint vs Svalbard Sea Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Soft Mint on one side and Svalbard Sea on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Soft Mint comparisons
See how Soft Mint stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
A 7-point LRV gap (83 vs 77) makes White Dove the marginally brighter of the two.
Soft Mint reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 52), opening up a space where Purbeck Stone encloses it.
Soft Mint reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
Soft Mint reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 60), opening up a space where Agreeable Gray encloses it.
At LRV 77 vs 58, Soft Mint is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 77 vs 27, Soft Mint is decisively the brighter choice.
Soft Mint reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
At LRV 77 vs 55, Soft Mint is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 77 vs 44, Soft Mint is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reads slightly lighter (LRV 84 vs 77), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
A 11-point LRV gap (77 vs 66) makes Soft Mint the marginally brighter of the two.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 77 vs 74), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 77 vs 12, Soft Mint is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 77 vs 8, Soft Mint is decisively the brighter choice.
A 9-point LRV gap (77 vs 68) makes Soft Mint the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 77 vs 12, Soft Mint is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 77 vs 45, Soft Mint is decisively the brighter choice.
Soft Mint reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.