Alabaster vs RAL 140-6
Alabaster (Cloverdale Paint) and RAL 140-6 (RAL Effect) come from different manufacturers. These are both beiges, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within beige to land. The 6-point LRV gap — 66 for RAL 140-6 vs 60 for Alabaster — means RAL 140-6 will open up a space more effectively. ΔE 3.8 means they're clearly different, but not dramatically so — they'd pair well in the same room. Below you'll find 3 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Alabaster vs RAL 140-6 in Real Spaces
3 real rooms side by side. Alabaster and RAL 140-6 are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
A living room wall sees more varied light than almost any other surface in the house, which makes the choice between these two more nuanced than a chip suggests. RAL 140-6 reads slightly lighter here — a subtle but real difference in how open the space feels.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. RAL 140-6 has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Bathroom
Small bathrooms intensify color. A shade that seems quiet in a larger room can feel immersive when you're surrounded by it on four walls. RAL 140-6 has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Color Details
Alabaster vs RAL 140-6 Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Alabaster on one side and RAL 140-6 on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Alabaster comparisons
See how Alabaster stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 83 vs 60, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
Alabaster reads slightly lighter (LRV 60 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
With LRVs of 60 and 60, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 60 vs 58), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 60 vs 27, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
A 5-point LRV gap (60 vs 55) makes Alabaster the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 60 vs 44, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 60), opening up a space where Alabaster encloses it.
A 6-point LRV gap (66 vs 60) makes Balboa Mist the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 74 vs 60, Shoji White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 60 vs 12, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 60 vs 8, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
A 8-point LRV gap (68 vs 60) makes Skimming Stone the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 60 vs 12, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 60 vs 45, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.