Batter vs RAL 140-6
Where Batter belongs to Cloverdale Paint's range, RAL 140-6 is a RAL Effect color. These are both beiges, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within beige to land. They have nearly identical light reflectance values (64 vs 66), so they'll read as similarly Light in most lighting conditions. At ΔE 1.2, these are close — the kind of difference that matters when choosing between them, but doesn't read strongly in a finished room. Below you'll find 3 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Batter vs RAL 140-6 in Real Spaces
3 real rooms side by side. Batter and RAL 140-6 are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
In a living room, color works across both daylight and evening light — the same wall can read very differently at noon and at 8pm. The two are close enough that the choice comes down to finer qualities — undertone, texture, what the color sits next to.
Bedroom
The context that matters most in a bedroom is how a color reads under a bedside lamp at night, not under noon daylight. At this scale the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side, as shown here, to reliably tell them apart.
Bathroom
Bathrooms are one of the few spaces where you're genuinely enclosed by the paint color, which makes the choice between these two more consequential. At this scale the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side, as shown here, to reliably tell them apart.
Color Details
Batter vs RAL 140-6 Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Batter on one side and RAL 140-6 on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Batter comparisons
See how Batter stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 64), opening up a space where Batter encloses it.
At LRV 64 vs 52, Batter is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 64 vs 30, Batter is decisively the brighter choice.
A 4-point LRV gap (64 vs 60) makes Batter the marginally brighter of the two.
Batter reads slightly lighter (LRV 64 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Batter reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 64 vs 43, Batter is decisively the brighter choice.
Batter reads slightly lighter (LRV 64 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Batter reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 64, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 66 and 64, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 64), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Batter reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Batter reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 8), opening up a space where Duck Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 64), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Batter reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Batter reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 64 vs 31, Batter is decisively the brighter choice.