RAL 190-3 vs Jetstream
RAL 190-3 is a RAL Effect color while Jetstream comes from Sherwin-Williams. Both sit in the blue family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. At LRV 67 vs 60, RAL 190-3 will read as the brighter of the two — a 7-point gap that matters most in north-facing or low-light rooms. At ΔE 4.7, the difference is perceptible but not dramatic — the two can work harmoniously in the same space. Below you'll find 5 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 190-3 vs Jetstream in Real Spaces
5 real rooms side by side. RAL 190-3 and Jetstream are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
Living rooms test a color across a full range of conditions — morning sun, afternoon shade, and evening lamp light all shift how both of these read. RAL 190-3 has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Bedroom
Bedroom walls are often seen under warm artificial light, a context that shifts both colors from how they look on a chip. The brightness difference is modest but present — RAL 190-3 gives the walls a little more lift.
Kitchen
Kitchen lighting tends to be bright and directional, which sharpens contrast and makes undertone differences more apparent. The brightness difference is modest but present — RAL 190-3 gives the walls a little more lift.
Bathroom
Bathrooms amplify color — the enclosed space and reflective surfaces make what reads subtle elsewhere feel more present here. The brightness difference is modest but present — RAL 190-3 gives the walls a little more lift.
Color Details
RAL 190-3 vs Jetstream Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 190-3 on one side and Jetstream on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 190-3 comparisons
See how RAL 190-3 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 67), opening up a space where RAL 190-3 encloses it.
At LRV 67 vs 52, RAL 190-3 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 67 vs 30, RAL 190-3 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 6-point LRV gap (67 vs 60) makes RAL 190-3 the marginally brighter of the two.
RAL 190-3 reads slightly lighter (LRV 67 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 190-3 reflects far more light (LRV 67 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 67 vs 43, RAL 190-3 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 190-3 reads slightly lighter (LRV 67 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 190-3 reflects far more light (LRV 67 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 67, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 67 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 67), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 190-3 reflects far more light (LRV 67 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
RAL 190-3 reflects far more light (LRV 67 vs 8), opening up a space where Duck Green encloses it.
With LRVs of 68 and 67, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
RAL 190-3 reflects far more light (LRV 67 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
RAL 190-3 reflects far more light (LRV 67 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 67 vs 31, RAL 190-3 is decisively the brighter choice.