RAL 280-2 vs Cinnamon Foam
Where RAL 280-2 belongs to RAL Effect's range, Cinnamon Foam is a Valspar color. These are both beiges, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within beige to land. They have nearly identical light reflectance values (66 vs 65), so they'll read as similarly Light in most lighting conditions. With a ΔE of 17.2, the contrast is hard to miss. These aren't variations on a theme — they're two different answers to the same question. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
RAL 280-2 vs Cinnamon Foam Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 280-2 on one side and Cinnamon Foam on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 280-2 comparisons
See how RAL 280-2 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 83 vs 66, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 280-2 reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 52), opening up a space where Purbeck Stone encloses it.
RAL 280-2 reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
RAL 280-2 reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 60), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
A 8-point LRV gap (66 vs 58) makes RAL 280-2 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 66 vs 27, RAL 280-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 280-2 reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
A 11-point LRV gap (66 vs 55) makes RAL 280-2 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 66 vs 44, RAL 280-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 66), opening up a space where RAL 280-2 encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 66 vs 66), so neither reads brighter in a room.
A 9-point LRV gap (74 vs 66) makes Shoji White the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 66 vs 12, RAL 280-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 66 vs 8, RAL 280-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 68 vs 66), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 66 vs 12, RAL 280-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 66 vs 45, RAL 280-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 280-2 reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.