
RAL 420-M vs Clay Pot
RAL 420-M is a RAL Effect color while Clay Pot comes from Sherwin-Williams. Both sit in the pink-red family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. With LRVs of 12 and 12, they'll behave almost identically in terms of how much light they reflect back into a room. With a ΔE of 1.7, the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side to reliably tell them apart. Below you'll find 3 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 420-M vs Clay Pot in Real Spaces
3 real rooms side by side. RAL 420-M and Clay Pot are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Bedroom
Bedroom walls are often seen under warm artificial light, a context that shifts both colors from how they look on a chip. The two are close enough that the choice comes down to finer qualities — undertone, texture, what the color sits next to.
Kitchen
Kitchen lighting tends to be bright and directional, which sharpens contrast and makes undertone differences more apparent. The two are close enough that the choice comes down to finer qualities — undertone, texture, what the color sits next to.
Bathroom
Bathrooms amplify color — the enclosed space and reflective surfaces make what reads subtle elsewhere feel more present here. The two are close enough that the choice comes down to finer qualities — undertone, texture, what the color sits next to.
Color Details
RAL 420-M vs Clay Pot Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 420-M on one side and Clay Pot on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 420-M comparisons
See how RAL 420-M stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.


White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 12), opening up a space where RAL 420-M encloses it.


At LRV 52 vs 12, Purbeck Stone is decisively the brighter choice.


At LRV 30 vs 12, Evergreen Fog is decisively the brighter choice.


At LRV 60 vs 12, Agreeable Gray is decisively the brighter choice.


Accessible Beige reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 12), opening up a space where RAL 420-M encloses it.


Denim Drift reflects far more light (LRV 27 vs 12), opening up a space where RAL 420-M encloses it.


At LRV 43 vs 12, French Gray is decisively the brighter choice.


Tranquil Dawn reflects far more light (LRV 55 vs 12), opening up a space where RAL 420-M encloses it.


Hardwick White reflects far more light (LRV 44 vs 12), opening up a space where RAL 420-M encloses it.


At LRV 84 vs 12, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.


Balboa Mist reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 12), opening up a space where RAL 420-M encloses it.


Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 12), opening up a space where RAL 420-M encloses it.


With LRVs of 12 and 12, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.


RAL 420-M reads slightly lighter (LRV 12 vs 8), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.


Skimming Stone reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 12), opening up a space where RAL 420-M encloses it.


With LRVs of 12 and 12, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.


Saybrook Sage reflects far more light (LRV 45 vs 12), opening up a space where RAL 420-M encloses it.


At LRV 31 vs 12, Pale Green is decisively the brighter choice.




























