RAL 760-5 vs Inland
RAL 760-5 (RAL Effect) and Inland (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. RAL 760-5 reads as green-yellow, while Inland reads as green-grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. The 4-point LRV gap — 22 for Inland vs 18 for RAL 760-5 — means Inland will open up a space more effectively. ΔE 5.4 means they're clearly different, but not dramatically so — they'd pair well in the same room. Below you'll find 3 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 760-5 vs Inland in Real Spaces
3 real rooms side by side. RAL 760-5 and Inland are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. Inland has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Kitchen
Kitchens often have the harshest, most revealing light in the house — under-cabinet LEDs and overhead fixtures that strip away subtlety. Inland has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Bathroom
Small bathrooms intensify color. A shade that seems quiet in a larger room can feel immersive when you're surrounded by it on four walls. Inland has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Color Details
RAL 760-5 vs Inland Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 760-5 on one side and Inland on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 760-5 comparisons
See how RAL 760-5 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 83 vs 18, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
Purbeck Stone reflects far more light (LRV 52 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 760-5 encloses it.
Evergreen Fog reflects far more light (LRV 30 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 760-5 encloses it.
Agreeable Gray reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 760-5 encloses it.
At LRV 58 vs 18, Accessible Beige is decisively the brighter choice.
A 9-point LRV gap (27 vs 18) makes Denim Drift the marginally brighter of the two.
French Gray reflects far more light (LRV 43 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 760-5 encloses it.
At LRV 55 vs 18, Tranquil Dawn is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 44 vs 18, Hardwick White is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 760-5 encloses it.
At LRV 66 vs 18, Balboa Mist is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 74 vs 18, Shoji White is decisively the brighter choice.
A 6-point LRV gap (18 vs 12) makes RAL 760-5 the marginally brighter of the two.
A 10-point LRV gap (18 vs 8) makes RAL 760-5 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 68 vs 18, Skimming Stone is decisively the brighter choice.
A 6-point LRV gap (18 vs 12) makes RAL 760-5 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 45 vs 18, Saybrook Sage is decisively the brighter choice.
Pale Green reflects far more light (LRV 31 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 760-5 encloses it.