Match RAL 670-M
RAL Effect RAL 670-M is a mid-tone shade with an LRV of 32. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.
View full RAL 670-M color page →
Closest matches across every brand
One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.
A 8-point LRV gap (40 vs 32) makes Nordic Sky the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 3.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 32 vs 32), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 4.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 34 vs 32), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 5.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
A 3-point LRV gap (32 vs 29) makes RAL 670-M the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 6.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
RAL 670-M reads slightly lighter (LRV 32 vs 28), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 8.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
RAL 670-M reads slightly lighter (LRV 32 vs 29), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 8.7 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
A 3-point LRV gap (36 vs 32) makes S 3010-R80B the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 13.3 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.
A 6-point LRV gap (38 vs 32) makes Gustavian Blue the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 13.3 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.
A 6-point LRV gap (32 vs 27) makes RAL 670-M the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 13.5 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.