Match Camelback

Sherwin-Williams Camelback is a mid-tone shade, warm in character with an LRV of 42. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.

View full Camelback color page →
Camelback
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122#C5AA85LRV 42Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Twilight Gold
Camelback
Camelback
Twilight Gold vs Camelback
Benjamin Moore
Twilight Gold
1069 · LRV 43
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

With LRVs of 43 and 42, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.3 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.3Subtle
Rabbit
Camelback
Camelback
Rabbit vs Camelback
PPG
Rabbit
PPG15-11 · LRV 42
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

With LRVs of 42 and 42, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.4 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.4Subtle
Camelback
Camelback
Dromedary Camel
Dromedary Camel
Camelback vs Dromedary Camel
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42
Sherwin-Williams
Dromedary Camel
7694 · LRV 44

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 44 vs 42), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 1.6 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.6Subtle
Green Gold
Green Gold
Camelback
Camelback
Green Gold vs Camelback
Cloverdale Paint
Green Gold
0317 · LRV 46
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

Green Gold reads slightly lighter (LRV 46 vs 42), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 2.1 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.1Subtle
Refined Yellow
Refined Yellow
Camelback
Camelback
Refined Yellow vs Camelback
Jotun
Refined Yellow
12082 · LRV 44
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 44 vs 42), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 4.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.4Noticeable
RAL 780-4
RAL 780-4
Camelback
Camelback
RAL 780-4 vs Camelback
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 780-4
RAL 780-4 · LRV 47
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

RAL 780-4 reads slightly lighter (LRV 47 vs 42), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 4.8 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.8Noticeable
Beige
Beige
Camelback
Camelback
Beige vs Camelback
RAL ClassicClassic
Beige
RAL 1001 · LRV 48
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

Beige reads slightly lighter (LRV 48 vs 42), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 5.0 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.0Noticeable
Camelback
Camelback
Toffee
Camelback vs Toffee
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42
Tikkurila
Toffee
V396 · LRV 37

Camelback reads slightly lighter (LRV 42 vs 37), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 5.7 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.7Noticeable
Roman Plaster
Roman Plaster
Camelback
Camelback
Roman Plaster vs Camelback
Little Greene
Roman Plaster
31 · LRV 44
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 44 vs 42), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 5.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.8Noticeable
Wild Wonder
Wild Wonder
Camelback
Camelback
Wild Wonder vs Camelback
Dulux
Wild Wonder
50YY 49/191 · LRV 49
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

A 7-point LRV gap (49 vs 42) makes Wild Wonder the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 6.0 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.0Noticeable
Harvest Brown
Harvest Brown
Camelback
Camelback
Harvest Brown vs Camelback
Behr
Harvest Brown
710D-4 · LRV 39
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

Camelback reads slightly lighter (LRV 42 vs 39), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 6.2 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.2Noticeable
Faded Terracotta
Faded Terracotta
Camelback
Camelback
Faded Terracotta vs Camelback
Farrow & Ball
Faded Terracotta
CC8 · LRV 52
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

A 10-point LRV gap (52 vs 42) makes Faded Terracotta the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 8.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.3Noticeable
Camelback
Camelback
Botanical Beauty
Camelback vs Botanical Beauty
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42
Valspar
Botanical Beauty
V095-3 · LRV 49

Botanical Beauty reads slightly lighter (LRV 49 vs 42), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 8.7 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.7Noticeable
S 3005-Y20R
S 3005-Y20R
Camelback
Camelback
S 3005-Y20R vs Camelback
NCS
S 3005-Y20R
S 3005-Y20R · LRV 41
Sherwin-Williams
Camelback
6122 · LRV 42

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 42 vs 41), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 12.6 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 12.6Distinct