Match Leapfrog

Sherwin-Williams Leapfrog is a mid-tone shade, neutral in character with an LRV of 26. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.

View full Leapfrog color page →
Leapfrog
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431#88915DLRV 26Neutral

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Forest Hills Green
Forest Hills Green
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Forest Hills Green vs Leapfrog
Benjamin Moore
Forest Hills Green
433 · LRV 27
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

With LRVs of 27 and 26, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 3.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.6Noticeable
Glade Green
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Glade Green vs Leapfrog
PPG
Glade Green
PPG1119-7 · LRV 23
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

Leapfrog reads slightly lighter (LRV 26 vs 23), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 3.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.6Noticeable
Sap Green
Sap Green
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Sap Green vs Leapfrog
Farrow & Ball
Sap Green
56 · LRV 21
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

Leapfrog reads slightly lighter (LRV 26 vs 21), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 4.3 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.3Noticeable
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Tansy Green
Tansy Green
Leapfrog vs Tansy Green
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26
Sherwin-Williams
Tansy Green
6424 · LRV 28

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 28 vs 26), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 5.2 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.2Noticeable
Tuscany Hillside
Tuscany Hillside
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Tuscany Hillside vs Leapfrog
Behr
Tuscany Hillside
PPU10-02 · LRV 22
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

A 5-point LRV gap (26 vs 22) makes Leapfrog the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.3Noticeable
Green Knoll
Green Knoll
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Green Knoll vs Leapfrog
Cloverdale Paint
Green Knoll
0760 · LRV 21
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

A 5-point LRV gap (26 vs 21) makes Leapfrog the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.4Noticeable
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Arbour
Leapfrog vs Arbour
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26
Tikkurila
Arbour
S451 · LRV 27

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 27 vs 26), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 7.5 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.5Noticeable
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Prairie Sage
Prairie Sage
Leapfrog vs Prairie Sage
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26
Valspar
Prairie Sage
8003-28E · LRV 29

With LRVs of 29 and 26, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 7.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.6Noticeable
RAL 240-3
RAL 240-3
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
RAL 240-3 vs Leapfrog
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 240-3
RAL 240-3 · LRV 27
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 27 vs 26), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 8.0 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.0Noticeable
Sage Green
Sage Green
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Sage Green vs Leapfrog
Little Greene
Sage Green
80 · LRV 20
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

A 6-point LRV gap (26 vs 20) makes Leapfrog the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 9.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 9.9Noticeable
April Green
April Green
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
April Green vs Leapfrog
Jotun
April Green
8109 · LRV 34
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

April Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 34 vs 26), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 10.8 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 10.8Distinct
Olive yellow
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Olive yellow vs Leapfrog
RAL ClassicClassic
Olive yellow
RAL 1020 · LRV 29
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

Olive yellow reads slightly lighter (LRV 29 vs 26), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 12.3 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 12.3Distinct
Celtic Forest 2
Celtic Forest 2
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
Celtic Forest 2 vs Leapfrog
Dulux
Celtic Forest 2
90YY 35/169 · LRV 35
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

A 9-point LRV gap (35 vs 26) makes Celtic Forest 2 the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 13.9 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 13.9Distinct
S 4010-G50Y
Leapfrog
Leapfrog
S 4010-G50Y vs Leapfrog
NCS
S 4010-G50Y
S 4010-G50Y · LRV 29
Sherwin-Williams
Leapfrog
6431 · LRV 26

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 29 vs 26), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 18.6 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 18.6Distinct