Match Swing Brown

Sherwin-Williams Swing Brown is a deep, low-reflectance shade, warm in character with an LRV of 20. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.

View full Swing Brown color page →
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046#947569LRV 20Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Mulberry Silk
Mulberry Silk
Swing Brown
Mulberry Silk vs Swing Brown
Sherwin-Williams
Mulberry Silk
0001 · LRV 20
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 20 vs 20), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 1.3 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.3Subtle
Temptation
Temptation
Swing Brown
Temptation vs Swing Brown
Cloverdale Paint
Temptation
0150 · LRV 20
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 20 vs 20), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 2.7 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.7Subtle
Organic Red
Organic Red
Swing Brown
Organic Red vs Swing Brown
Jotun
Organic Red
20120 · LRV 22
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

With LRVs of 22 and 20, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.8 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.8Subtle
Fox Hollow Brown
Swing Brown
Fox Hollow Brown vs Swing Brown
Benjamin Moore
Fox Hollow Brown
1235 · LRV 22
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

With LRVs of 22 and 20, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 3.3 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.3Noticeable
Woodchuck
Woodchuck
Swing Brown
Woodchuck vs Swing Brown
PPG
Woodchuck
PPG1016-6 · LRV 19
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 20 vs 19), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.4Noticeable
Swing Brown
N473
Swing Brown vs N473
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20
Tikkurila
N473
N473 · LRV 18

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 20 vs 18), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.5 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.5Noticeable
Nether Red
Nether Red
Swing Brown
Nether Red vs Swing Brown
Little Greene
Nether Red
315 · LRV 20
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

With LRVs of 20 and 20, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 3.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.6Noticeable
Frontier Brown
Swing Brown
Frontier Brown vs Swing Brown
Behr
Frontier Brown
N190-5 · LRV 24
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

Frontier Brown reads slightly lighter (LRV 24 vs 20), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 5.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.1Noticeable
Sulking Room Pink
Sulking Room Pink
Swing Brown
Sulking Room Pink vs Swing Brown
Farrow & Ball
Sulking Room Pink
294 · LRV 26
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

A 6-point LRV gap (26 vs 20) makes Sulking Room Pink the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.3Noticeable
Pearl beige
Pearl beige
Swing Brown
Pearl beige vs Swing Brown
RAL ClassicClassic
Pearl beige
RAL 1035 · LRV 35
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

Pearl beige reflects far more light (LRV 35 vs 20), opening up a space where Swing Brown encloses it. At ΔE 9.7 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 9.7Noticeable
Swing Brown
Lilac Gray
Lilac Gray
Swing Brown vs Lilac Gray
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20
Valspar
Lilac Gray
1003-9C · LRV 25

A 5-point LRV gap (25 vs 20) makes Lilac Gray the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 9.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 9.8Noticeable
Nomadic Glow 2
Nomadic Glow 2
Swing Brown
Nomadic Glow 2 vs Swing Brown
Dulux
Nomadic Glow 2
30YR 31/154 · LRV 31
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

A 11-point LRV gap (31 vs 20) makes Nomadic Glow 2 the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 9.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 9.9Noticeable
S 4010-Y50R
S 4010-Y50R
Swing Brown
S 4010-Y50R vs Swing Brown
NCS
S 4010-Y50R
S 4010-Y50R · LRV 30
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

A 10-point LRV gap (30 vs 20) makes S 4010-Y50R the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 10.4 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 10.4Distinct
RAL 780-5
RAL 780-5
Swing Brown
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 780-5
RAL 780-5 · LRV 29
Sherwin-Williams
Swing Brown
6046 · LRV 20

A 9-point LRV gap (29 vs 20) makes RAL 780-5 the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 10.6 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 10.6Distinct